IIBA-AAC · IIBA · Principles of Agile Analysis · Bank updated 2026-07-02
IIBA-AAC practice questions: Principles of Agile Analysis
5 free questions from 79 on this area · answer and explanation for each · no sign-up
These 5 questions come from the Principles of Agile Analysis section of our IIBA-AAC bank (79 questions on this area). Every question is original, with the correct answer explained and linked to the source it is drawn from.
1/5 · Principles of Agile Analysis
A delivery team is optimizing the checkout screen of an e-commerce app and proudly reports faster page loads. However, customers still abandon purchases because the upstream account-creation flow and the downstream payment-confirmation email are confusing and disconnected. Which principle of agile analysis is the team most clearly failing to apply?
ASee the Whole
BGet Real Using Examples
CAvoid Waste
DUnderstand What is Doable
Show answer & explanation
A is correct. See the Whole urges analysts and teams to keep the complete value-delivery context in view — how components, flows, and stakeholders connect — rather than optimizing one piece in isolation. Improving only the checkout screen while the surrounding account and confirmation steps remain broken is the classic anti-pattern this principle warns against. The other principles address waste, concrete examples, and feasibility, none of which is the central failure here.
↗ Agile Extension to the BABOK Guide v2 — Principles of Agile Analysis
2/5 · Principles of Agile Analysis · hard
An analyst routinely produces a 40-page requirements document for every feature, including extensive sections that no downstream consumer ever reads, while the team's actual understanding comes from conversations and tests. Applying the principle 'Avoid Waste', what is the soundest response?
AReduce documentation to the level that genuinely supports shared understanding and decisions, eliminating analysis effort that no one consumes
BStop all written documentation entirely, since agile means no documentation
CShift the documentation burden to developers so the analyst's time is freed for other tasks
DKeep producing the full document because thoroughness is always safer than risk of under-documentation
Show answer & explanation
A is correct. Avoid Waste means identifying and eliminating effort, artifacts, and activities that do not contribute value. Heavy documentation that no consumer reads is waste; the response is to right-size analysis outputs to what truly supports understanding and decision-making, not to keep, eliminate, or merely reassign everything indiscriminately.
↗ Agile Extension to the BABOK Guide v2 — Principles of Agile Analysis
3/5 · Principles of Agile Analysis
Within the three horizons of agile business analysis, which statement best characterizes the focus of the Strategy Horizon?
ADefining the desired future state and the longer-term direction of the enterprise, guiding which initiatives are worth pursuing.
BCoordinating the day-to-day backlog of one delivery team.
CManaging the scope and roadmap of one specific change effort from inception to closure.
DDecomposing epics into stories sized for a single sprint.
Show answer & explanation
4/5 · Principles of Agile Analysis · hard
An organization wants the benefits of fast feedback and learning while still maintaining a longer-term direction. It keeps long-term plans that are easy to change and lets short-term plans inform them, treating each plan as a hypothesis to be proven and adjusting in real time as it learns. Which planning approach does the Agile Extension describe in these terms, and why does it suit an agile mindset?
AAdaptive planning, because it supports both fast feedback and long-term planning and treats each plan as a hypothesis adjusted as learning emerges, with less detail to change so resistance to change is lessened.
BPredictive planning, because constructing a detailed plan for the entire duration up front gives the certainty needed to respond quickly to change.
CIterative planning, because creating a plan only for the current horizon scales well and naturally preserves a long-range objective.
DPredictive planning, because deviations from the plan are treated as risks to be managed back on track.
Show answer & explanation
A is correct. Adaptive planning (sometimes called rolling wave planning) requires both long- and short-term planning: long-term plans are easy to change, and short-term plans inform them. Each plan is treated as a hypothesis to be proven, with feedback and lessons learned used to adjust plans in real time. It suits the agile mindset because it is effective when there is value in both fast feedback and long-term planning, and because higher-level horizons are more abstract with less detail to change, lessening resistance to change.
↗ Agile Extension to the BABOK Guide v2 — Principles of Agile Analysis
5/5 · Principles of Agile Analysis · hard
A business analyst notices the team is under pressure to lock in a detailed UI design for a feature scheduled for release in month five, even though market research for that feature will not be complete until month three. She recommends delaying the detailed design decision until closer to when the needed information will be available and commitments become truly necessary. This recommendation best reflects which principle?
ASee the Whole
BUnderstand What Is Doable
CAvoid Waste
DGet Real Using Examples
Show answer & explanation
C is correct. Avoid Waste incorporates the lean concept of deciding as late as possible, so that decisions are made with the best available information and irreversible commitments are not made prematurely. Locking in UI design before market research concludes risks costly rework, which this principle explicitly seeks to prevent.
↗ Agile Extension to the BABOK Guide v2 — Principles of Agile Analysis
Other IIBA-AAC areas
The same kind of free sample for every other section of the IIBA-AAC bank:
Study Principles of Agile Analysis with instant feedback
6 free questions · filter study mode by area and difficulty · error log with spaced repetition · no card, no dumps, no ads.
Create your free account →
Read next
ECBA vs CCBA vs CBAP: Which IIBA Certification Fits Your Experience Level? (2026)
ECBA, CCBA or CBAP? The eligibility gate that picks for you, what the 2026 ECBA rewrite changed, and each credential's three-year cost, verified against IIBA.
PMI-PBA vs CBAP: The Business Analysis Certification Decision, Settled with Data
PMI-PBA ($405-555, 36 months of experience) vs CBAP ($495-650 all-in, 7,500 hours plus references): eligibility, exam mechanics, three-year cost, salary data.
ExamDeck is an independent study tool, not affiliated with IIBA®. IIBA-AAC and BABOK® are trademarks of the International Institute of Business Analysis. Exam facts checked against official IIBA materials (as of August 2026); confirm current details on iiba.org.