IIBA-CBDA · IIBA · Source Data · Bank updated 2026-07-02
IIBA-CBDA practice questions: Source Data
5 free questions from 49 on this area · answer and explanation for each · no sign-up
These 5 questions come from the Source Data section of our IIBA-CBDA bank (49 questions on this area, which carries 15% of the real exam). Every question is original, with the correct answer explained and linked to the source it is drawn from.
1/5 · Source Data
While profiling a customer table sourced for a marketing campaign, an analyst finds that 18% of the 'email_address' fields are blank. Every email that IS present is correctly formatted and valid, no duplicate customer rows exist, and records are refreshed daily. Which data quality dimension is MOST directly compromised by the blank email fields?
AAccuracy
BUniqueness
CCompleteness
DTimeliness
Show answer & explanation
C is correct. Data quality is assessed across dimensions including completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness, validity, and uniqueness. Missing required values is a completeness problem. The distractors are explicitly ruled out by the scenario: accuracy (present values are valid), uniqueness (no duplicates), and timeliness (daily refresh).
↗ IIBA Business Data Analytics Guide — Source Data
2/5 · Source Data
As part of collecting data, an analyst documents, for a key dataset, exactly where the data originates, what transformations are performed on it along the way, and where it is finally stored — in order to help assess its quality. The guide refers to understanding this end-to-end flow as which concept?
AData profiling
BData lineage
CSource-to-target mapping
DData sampling
Show answer & explanation
B is correct. Within Collect Data, the guide instructs analysts to understand where data comes from, what transformations are performed, and where it is finally stored in order to assess data quality, and explicitly names this data lineage. It is distinct from sampling, profiling, and source-to-target mapping.
↗ IIBA Business Data Analytics Guide — Source Data
3/5 · Source Data
While wrangling a freshly collected sensor dataset, an analyst notices a handful of temperature readings of 999 degrees recorded by a malfunctioning probe, far outside any physically possible range. The analyst is preparing the data and must decide how to treat these values. Which action reflects sound judgment at this stage?
AReplace the 999 values with the overall column average immediately, without checking whether the probe was actually faulty.
BLeave all values untouched because altering any collected value is always forbidden and would bias the results.
CInvestigate the 999 values to confirm they are sensor errors, then treat or remove them with the reason documented before analysis proceeds.
DSilently delete every record above the dataset's mean to make the distribution look cleaner.
Show answer & explanation
C is correct. Outlier handling during data wrangling requires investigation first: determine whether an extreme value is a genuine observation or an error. Here the readings are physically impossible and tied to a known malfunction, so confirming the cause and then treating or removing them — with the rationale recorded for transparency and reproducibility — is correct. Blanket rules ('never alter values' or 'always impute the mean') ignore the investigative judgment the task demands.
↗ IIBA Business Data Analytics Guide — Source Data
4/5 · Source Data · hard
An analyst wants to establish whether a new checkout-page layout causes higher conversion, not merely correlates with it. Rather than only observing customers who happen to see the existing page, the team randomly assigns incoming visitors to either the old or new layout and records conversions for each group. Which type of data collection is being used, and what does it enable that pure observation does not?
AExperimental collection, which through randomized assignment supports stronger causal inference than observational data.
BPassive collection, which removes the need to define any business question first.
CSecondary data collection, which reuses an external dataset instead of generating new data.
DObservational collection, which through randomized assignment proves causation directly.
Show answer & explanation
A is correct. Randomly assigning visitors to old/new layouts is experimental data collection (an A-B test). The intervention plus randomization balances confounding factors across groups, which is what permits causal inference — establishing that the layout causes the conversion change. Observational data merely records what occurs naturally and supports correlation, not causation. The collection is active and primary, not passive or secondary.
↗ IIBA Business Data Analytics Guide — Source Data
5/5 · Source Data · hard
A subscription business wants to predict next-quarter churn. An analyst decides to pull customer behavior data going back several years, reasoning that more history is always better. A senior colleague cautions that very old behavior may reflect a different product, pricing, and customer base than today's, while too short a window may miss seasonal patterns. What sourcing decision does this exchange most directly highlight?
ADeciding between primary and secondary data sources
BChoosing an appropriate time horizon for the data so the period sourced is both relevant to current conditions and long enough to capture meaningful patterns
CSelecting the correct unit of analysis for each row of data
DAssessing the velocity of incoming data
Show answer & explanation
B is correct. Determining the data needed includes deciding the time horizon, or look-back window — how far back the data should extend. Too long risks including history that no longer represents current conditions; too short risks missing seasonality or trends. This is a distinct sourcing decision from unit of analysis, source origin, or data velocity.
↗ IIBA Business Data Analytics Guide — Source Data
Other IIBA-CBDA areas
The same kind of free sample for every other section of the IIBA-CBDA bank:
Study Source Data with instant feedback
6 free questions · filter study mode by area and difficulty · error log with spaced repetition · no card, no dumps, no ads.
Create your free account →
Read next
ECBA vs CCBA vs CBAP: Which IIBA Certification Fits Your Experience Level? (2026)
ECBA, CCBA or CBAP? The eligibility gate that picks for you, what the 2026 ECBA rewrite changed, and each credential's three-year cost, verified against IIBA.
PMI-PBA vs CBAP: The Business Analysis Certification Decision, Settled with Data
PMI-PBA ($405-555, 36 months of experience) vs CBAP ($495-650 all-in, 7,500 hours plus references): eligibility, exam mechanics, three-year cost, salary data.
ExamDeck is an independent study tool, not affiliated with IIBA®. IIBA-CBDA and BABOK® are trademarks of the International Institute of Business Analysis. Exam facts checked against official IIBA materials (as of August 2026); confirm current details on iiba.org.