Home › SAA-C03 › Practice questions › Design Cost-Optimized Architectures
SAA-C03 · AWS · Design Cost-Optimized Architectures · Bank updated 2026-11-04

SAA-C03 practice questions: Design Cost-Optimized Architectures

5 free questions from 40 on this area · answer and explanation for each · no sign-up

These 5 questions come from the Design Cost-Optimized Architectures section of our SAA-C03 bank (40 questions on this area, which carries 20% of the real exam). Every question is original, with the correct answer explained and linked to the source it is drawn from.

Try 6 free SAA-C03 questions → All SAA-C03 sample questions

Free: 6 questions in study mode, no card. All 40 Design Cost-Optimized Architectures questions and the full SAA-C03 bank: $15 one-time.

1/5 · Design Cost-Optimized Architectures
A company is comparing the two Savings Plans types that apply to Amazon EC2 usage before committing to a three-year term. Which statement correctly describes how Compute Savings Plans differ from EC2 Instance Savings Plans?
ACompute Savings Plans are limited to Amazon EC2 usage, while EC2 Instance Savings Plans extend the same commitment to AWS Fargate and AWS Lambda usage as well as EC2.
BCompute Savings Plans require a commitment to one instance family in one Region, while EC2 Instance Savings Plans apply across instance families and Regions.
CCompute Savings Plans apply to Amazon EC2 usage regardless of instance family, size, Region, operating system, or tenancy, and also to Fargate and Lambda usage.
DCompute Savings Plans are purchased as a number of instances to be covered, while EC2 Instance Savings Plans are purchased as an hourly dollar commitment.
Answer: C. Task Statement 4.2 names AWS purchasing options including Savings Plans. AWS states that Compute Savings Plans 'provide lower prices on Amazon EC2 instance usage regardless of instance family, instance size, OS, tenancy, or AWS Region' and that this 'also applies to AWS Fargate and AWS Lambda usage', while EC2 Instance Savings Plans are committed 'to a specific instance family in a chosen AWS Region' and apply regardless of size, operating system, and tenancy within that family. Both are a per-hour spend commitment for a one-year or three-year term. Source: AWS SAA-C03 Exam Guide - Domain 4: Design Cost-Optimized Architectures
2/5 · Design Cost-Optimized Architectures · hard
An Amazon RDS database keeps automated backups with a 35-day retention period, and a long-standing job also takes a manual snapshot every day. Nobody has ever deleted one, the job has been failing for a week with an error that the limit of 100 manual DB snapshots for the Region has been reached, and snapshot storage now costs more than the DB instance itself. The compliance rule is point-in-time recovery for the last 35 days plus one restorable copy per month retained for seven years. Which solution will meet these requirements?
AReduce the automated backup retention period to one day and keep each of the existing manual snapshots exactly as it is today.
BKeep the 35-day automated backups, delete the daily snapshots apart from one per month, and hold those in an AWS Backup plan for seven years.
CCopy each existing manual snapshot to a second AWS Region for safekeeping and delete the originals from this Region.
DExport each manual snapshot to Amazon S3 in the S3 Glacier Deep Archive storage class and then delete the snapshots from Amazon RDS.
Answer: B. Task Statement 4.3 covers data retention policies and designing appropriate backup and retention policies including snapshot frequency. Amazon RDS automated backups provide point-in-time recovery across the retention period, which makes extra manual snapshots inside that window redundant. The Amazon RDS quotas page gives 'Manual DB instance snapshots' as 100 for each supported Region and notes that 'backups managed by AWS Backup are considered manual DB snapshots, but don't count toward the manual snapshot quota', which is why moving the long-term copies into a backup plan both expresses the monthly rule once and clears the quota. Exporting a snapshot to Amazon S3 produces analytics data, not a restorable DB snapshot. Source: AWS SAA-C03 Exam Guide - Domain 4: Design Cost-Optimized Architectures
3/5 · Design Cost-Optimized Architectures
Once a year an auditor asks a company to produce 30 TB of records that sit in the S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval storage class. The restore has to finish inside the auditor's 12-hour window, and the company wants the pull to add as little as it can to that month's bill. Which retrieval option should the company use?
ARestore the objects with the Standard retrieval tier
BRestore the objects with the Expedited retrieval tier
CRestore the objects with the Bulk retrieval tier for the archive
DRestore the objects with provisioned capacity for the expedited tier
Answer: C. Task Statement 4.1 covers selecting the appropriate backup and archival solution and storage tiering. The Amazon S3 User Guide's archive retrieval options topic gives the three tiers for S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval: Expedited objects under 250 MB 'are typically made available within 1-5 minutes' and are 'charged at the Expedited request and retrieval rate'; 'Standard retrievals typically finish within 3-5 hours'; and 'Bulk retrievals typically finish within 5-12 hours'. The same page states that 'Bulk retrievals are free for objects that are stored in the S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval or S3 Intelligent-Tiering storage classes', and the S3 pricing page repeats it: 'S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval Bulk data retrievals and requests are free of charge.' Provisioned capacity is described there as a way to 'ensure that Expedited retrieval capacity is available when you need it'. Two tiers land inside the 12-hour window and one of them costs nothing. Source: AWS SAA-C03 Exam Guide - Domain 4: Design Cost-Optimized Architectures
4/5 · Design Cost-Optimized Architectures · hard
A company holds a Compute Savings Plan whose hourly commitment is mostly consumed by a batch fleet running On-Demand. The team plans to move that entire fleet to Spot Instances to cut cost further. What is the effect on the existing commitment?
ASpot spend counts toward the commitment and the plan adds a further discount on top of the Spot price
Bthe unused commitment converts into Spot credits that are applied to the new fleet
CSpot spend does not apply to the commitment, so part of the hourly commitment may go unused
Dthe commitment shrinks in proportion to the usage that moved once the fleet is on Spot
Answer: C. Spot Instances are not covered by Savings Plans. A Savings Plan does not give extra savings on Spot usage, and Spot spend does not apply the commitment of a Compute Savings Plan. Terms of the commitment can't be changed after purchase, so moving the fleet may leave commitment unused. Source: Amazon Web Services documentation (docs.aws.amazon.com), Pricing and savings, p. n/a Source: AWS SAA-C03 Exam Guide - Domain 1: Design Secure Architectures
5/5 · Design Cost-Optimized Architectures
A DynamoDB table in provisioned mode is sized for a daily peak of 5,000 writes per second. Real traffic idles near 100 writes per second for most of the day, with peaks at unpredictable times. The monthly bill is far above what the consumed writes suggest. Which change addresses the cause?
ALower the provisioned write capacity to match the average consumption level
BSplit the table into several smaller tables, each billed only for the capacity it consumes
CKeep the capacity and rely on unused provisioned units being credited back at month end
DSwitch the table to on-demand mode so that each read and write is billed individually
Answer: D. In provisioned mode you are charged for the hourly capacity you provision, not what you consume, which suits steady, forecastable workloads. On-demand mode bills per request and scales automatically, so a spiky, unpredictable pattern avoids paying for idle peak capacity. Source: Amazon Web Services documentation (docs.aws.amazon.com), Provisioned mode, p. n/a Source: AWS SAA-C03 Exam Guide - Domain 1: Design Secure Architectures
Try 6 more free SAA-C03 questions → See the whole SAA-C03 bank

Other SAA-C03 areas

The same kind of free sample for every other section of the SAA-C03 bank:

Design Secure Architectures47 qDesign Resilient Architectures48 qDesign High-Performing Architectures45 q

Practise SAA-C03 with instant feedback

6 free questions in study mode · no card · full SAA-C03 bank with area filters and the error log: $15 one-time · no dumps, no ads.

Start SAA-C03 free →
Read next
SAA-C03 Study Plan: 6 Weeks From Cloud Practitioner, 10 Weeks From Zero A week-by-week SAA-C03 plan built on AWS's own exam guide: two tracks, what each domain really tests, and the facts AWS does and does not publish.
ExamDeck is an independent study tool, not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AWS. SAA-C03 and related marks are trademarks of their respective owners, used for identification only. Exam facts checked against official AWS materials (as of November 2026); always confirm current details with the vendor before booking.