Home › SY0-701 › Practice questions › Security Operations
SY0-701 · CompTIA · Security Operations · Bank updated 2026-11-04

SY0-701 practice questions: Security Operations

5 free questions from 66 on this area · answer and explanation for each · no sign-up

These 5 questions come from the Security Operations section of our SY0-701 bank (66 questions on this area, which carries 28% of the real exam). Every question is original, with the correct answer explained and linked to the source it is drawn from.

Try 6 free SY0-701 questions → All SY0-701 sample questions

Free: 6 questions in study mode, no card. All 66 Security Operations questions and the full SY0-701 bank: $15 one-time.

1/5 · Security Operations
A distributor manages two sets of handsets through one mobile device management platform. For the first set, counsel has confirmed that the company may erase the entire handset when it is reported lost, including photographs and messages the holder saved for personal use. For the second set, counsel has confirmed that the company may erase only the work profile and must leave the rest of the device untouched. Both sets are enrolled before first use, and policy permits personal use on both. Which deployment models are in play?
AThe first set is BYOD; the second is COPE
BBoth sets are CYOD under one policy
CThe first set is CYOD; the second is COPE
DThe first set is COPE; the second is BYOD
Answer: D. Objective 4.1 lists BYOD, COPE and CYOD as the mobile deployment models. Two questions separate them - who owns the hardware and who chooses it - and only the first has operational consequences worth testing. Ownership sets the limit of what management may do: a corporate-owned handset can be wiped completely, while on a personally owned device the organisation may act on the container it created and nothing else. Enrolment, a management platform and permitted personal use appear in all three models and identify none of them. Source: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Exam Objectives - Domain 4: Security Operations
2/5 · Security Operations
A payment service was unreachable for two hours when the TLS certificate on its load balancer expired. Responders installed a replacement the same evening, the ticket records every action with a timestamp, and the duty manager signed it off. Eleven weeks later a reporting service in the same estate is unreachable for the same reason. Which finding from the first outage is the root cause?
AThe engineer did not renew the certificate in time
BNothing warns the estate before a certificate expires
CCustomers reported the outage before monitoring did
DThe replacement certificate was issued for twelve months
Answer: B. Objective 4.8 lists root cause analysis alongside the incident response process phases, training, testing, threat hunting and digital forensics. A root cause analysis asks why the incident was possible, which is a different question from what happened and who did what: the ticket answers the second question completely and the same failure still occurred eleven weeks later in another team. NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 puts the same distinction into post-incident activity, where the questions to be answered include what corrective actions can prevent similar incidents in the future - an action that follows from the condition that permitted the incident, not from the individual step that was missed on the night. Source: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Exam Objectives - Domain 4: Security Operations
3/5 · Security Operations
A laptop's computer account is in the Finance organizational unit, which is nested inside the Staff organizational unit. The machine's screen-lock inactivity limit is configured in four places: the laptop's local policy sets 5 minutes, a GPO linked to the domain sets 10 minutes, a GPO linked to Staff sets 15 minutes and a GPO linked to Finance sets 30 minutes. No link is enforced, no inheritance is blocked and no filtering applies. Which limit is in effect on the laptop?
A5 minutes
B10 minutes
C15 minutes
D30 minutes
Answer: D. Objective 4.5 lists Group Policy under operating system security, and the setting that ends up on a machine is decided by processing order rather than by level or strictness. Microsoft's Group Policy Hierarchy page states: "By default, Group Policy is inherited and cumulative", and gives the order: the local GPO, then GPOs linked to sites, then GPOs linked to domains, then GPOs linked to organizational units - "For nested organizational units, GPOs linked to parent organizational units are applied before GPOs linked to child organizational units are applied." It adds: "The order in which GPOs are processed is significant because when policy is applied, it overwrites policy that was applied earlier." In this scenario the Finance GPO is processed last and its 30 minutes stands. The outcome changes only with the exceptions the scenario rules out: an enforced link on a higher-level GPO, blocked inheritance or security filtering. Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/desktop/policy/group-policy-hierarchy
4/5 · Security Operations
A new analyst ranks data sources for spotting incidents and places firewall and router logs at the top because they record every blocked connection attempt. How does the guide characterize these logs as a source of precursors and indicators?
Auseful for network trends and correlating events seen elsewhere, but not a primary source
Bthe most dependable primary source, since they log each blocked connection attempt in detail
Cvaluable chiefly for showing which user accounts were accessed and what actions were taken
Da record for trend reports, but too coarse to help correlate events seen on other devices
Answer: A. Logs from firewalls and routers mostly record blocked connection attempts with little detail about the activity, so they are not typically a primary source of precursors or indicators. They remain valuable for identifying network trends and correlating events detected by other devices. Source: NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 (2012), SP80061r2-p37 3.2.3 Sources of Precursors and Indicators, p. 37 Source: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Exam Objectives - Domain 4: Security Operations
5/5 · Security Operations · hard
Responders confirm that an attacker is active on a production server and want more evidence of the attacker's methods before acting. One proposes leaving things as they are for a while. Which approach is acceptable?
Alet the compromise continue on the server while logging it
Bredirect the attacker to a sandbox agreed with legal staff
Cleave the host online for a fixed period, then contain it
Dlimit the attacker to non-critical hosts on the live network
Answer: B. Some organizations redirect the attacker to a sandbox, a form of containment, to monitor activity and gather evidence; the team should discuss this with its legal department. Other ways of monitoring should not be used, since allowing a known compromise to continue may create liability and delayed containment is dangerous (pp.45-46). Source: NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2, Computer Security Incident Handling Guide (2012), 3.3.1 Choosing a Containment Strategy (SP80061r2-p46), p. 46 Source: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Exam Objectives - Domain 4: Security Operations
Try 6 more free SY0-701 questions → See the whole SY0-701 bank

Other SY0-701 areas

The same kind of free sample for every other section of the SY0-701 bank:

Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations58 qSecurity Program Management and Oversight56 qSecurity Architecture51 qGeneral Security Concepts58 q

Practise SY0-701 with instant feedback

6 free questions in study mode · no card · full SY0-701 bank with area filters and the error log: $15 one-time · no dumps, no ads.

Start SY0-701 free →
Read next
Security+ SY0-701 vs SY0-801: Which Version to Take in 2026-2027 SY0-801 launches around 17 November 2026; SY0-701 retires 11 June 2027. Domain shifts, AI topics and which version to book, verified against CompTIA. ISC2 CC vs CompTIA Security+: Which Entry-Level Security Certification First CC asks for no experience and costs US$199; Security+ is broader, tests hands-on tasks and changes version on 17 November 2026. Which to take first.
ExamDeck is an independent study tool, not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by CompTIA. SY0-701 and related marks are trademarks of their respective owners, used for identification only. Exam facts checked against official CompTIA materials (as of November 2026); always confirm current details with the vendor before booking.