SY0-701 · CompTIA · Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations · Bank updated 2026-11-04
SY0-701 practice questions: Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations
5 free questions from 58 on this area · answer and explanation for each · no sign-up
These 5 questions come from the Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations section of our SY0-701 bank (58 questions on this area, which carries 22% of the real exam). Every question is original, with the correct answer explained and linked to the source it is drawn from.
Free: 6 questions in study mode, no card. All 58 Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations questions and the full SY0-701 bank: $15 one-time.
1/5 · Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations
A server is rebuilt after an intrusion: the disks are wiped and repartitioned, the operating system is reinstalled from the vendor's media, and every credential the server used is changed. Within a fortnight the same outbound connection to the attacker's infrastructure reappears, and a capture shows it opening before the operating system has finished starting. Which exposure BEST explains the return?
AAn implant in the server's firmware
BA backdoor account in the directory
CA scheduled task left on the disks
DA tampered image on the build server
Answer: A. Objective 2.3 lists firmware alongside end-of-life and legacy under hardware vulnerabilities. NIST SP 800-193 describes platform firmware as highly privileged, necessary for the system to operate and persistent across power cycles because it is held in non-volatile memory, and warns that sophisticated attacks may inject persistent malware into that firmware to modify low-level services, exfiltrate data or otherwise affect the security posture of the system. The practical consequence is the one this item turns on: wiping, repartitioning, reinstalling and rotating credentials all operate above the layer where such an implant lives, so the only signal a responder gets is behaviour that begins before the operating system does.
Source: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Exam Objectives - Domain 2: Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations
2/5 · Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations · hard
A customer of a shared virtualization platform reports that newly provisioned guests occasionally start with memory pages containing fragments of another tenant's spreadsheet data. The platform is fully patched, each guest runs only its own workloads, and monitoring has never observed a guest process executing on the host itself. Which vulnerability BEST accounts for the finding?
AVM escape
BResource reuse
CMemory injection
DCloud-specific flaw
Answer: B. Objective 2.3 lists virtual machine escape and resource reuse as the two virtualization vulnerabilities. NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 control SC-4, Information in Shared System Resources, states the principle the platform has broken: the system prevents unauthorized and unintended information transfer via shared system resources, so that information produced by the actions of prior users or roles is not available to any current user or role that obtains access to a shared system resource after that resource has been released back to the system. That is why the leak shows up at provisioning time and concerns data rather than control of the host.
Source: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Exam Objectives - Domain 2: Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations
3/5 · Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations
Customers of an online bank report payees added to their accounts that they never created. Server logs show that each change arrived with the customer's valid session cookie, from the customer's usual IP address, a few seconds after the customer had opened a page on an unrelated forum. Which change to the add-payee function addresses the cause?
ARestrict the change to POST requests from the form
BAdd a confirmation page before the payee is saved
CEmbed a random token in the form and validate it
DServe the whole payee flow over HTTPS with HSTS
Answer: C. Objective 2.4 lists forgery among application attacks, and the indicators here are its signature: requests that are fully authenticated, come from the victim's own browser and address, and follow a visit to another site. OWASP's page on cross-site request forgery explains why: "For most sites, browser requests automatically include any credentials associated with the site, such as the user's session cookie, IP address, Windows domain credentials, and so forth." Under prevention measures that do not work it lists POST-only endpoints ("The misconception is that since the attacker cannot construct a malicious link, a CSRF attack cannot be executed."), multi-step flows ("Multi-Step transactions are not an adequate prevention of CSRF. As long as an attacker can predict or deduce each step of the completed transaction, then CSRF is possible.") and "HTTPS by itself does nothing to defend against CSRF." The OWASP CSRF Prevention Cheat Sheet gives the primary defence: "If the framework does not have built-in CSRF protection, add CSRF tokens to all state-changing requests (requests that cause actions on the site) and validate them on the backend."
Source: https://community.owasp.org/attacks/csrf
4/5 · Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations
A finance clerk's workstation shows a full-screen message demanding payment before the machine can be used again. An administrator boots the disk from a rescue environment and finds every document intact and readable. Which kind of malicious code best fits this behaviour?
Aransomware that locks users out of the operating system
Bransomware that encrypts specific files on the hard disk
Ca virus that attaches itself to existing executables
Da Trojan horse that carries an unexpected function
Answer: A. NIST SP 800-12 describes two kinds of ransomware. Encryptors encrypt files and demand payment to decrypt them. Lockers lock users out of the operating system, and the files remain accessible. Readable documents behind a payment screen point to a locker. A virus and a Trojan horse are different categories of malicious code.
Source: NIST SP 800-12 Rev. 1, An Introduction to Information Security (2017), https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-12r1.pdf, 4.1.4 Malicious Code (SP80012r1-p34), p. 34
Source: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Exam Objectives - Domain 4: Security Operations
5/5 · Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations
For nine months a research firm sees almost no outages or data damage. A review then finds a back door created after the intruder mapped the network, regular outbound contact with an external command host, and code that was repeatedly rewritten to evade intrusion detection. What was the intruder's primary objective?
Acausing network outages to extort a payment from the firm
Bdestroying programs and data on the network to disrupt operations
Cassembling the firm's hosts into a bot network rented out for months
Dharvesting specific data and information from the target network
Answer: D. An advanced persistent threat is a long-term intrusion attempting to gain access to specific data. Instead of trying to cause damage, APT attacks are designed to harvest information. The attacker may evade detection, create a back door once enough is known about the network, and use an external command and control system to extract information.
Source: NIST SP 800-12 Rev. 1, An Introduction to Information Security (2017), SP80012r1-p31, p. 31
Source: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Exam Objectives - Domain 4: Security Operations
Other SY0-701 areas
The same kind of free sample for every other section of the SY0-701 bank:
Practise SY0-701 with instant feedback
6 free questions in study mode · no card · full SY0-701 bank with area filters and the error log: $15 one-time · no dumps, no ads.
Start SY0-701 free →
ExamDeck is an independent study tool, not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by CompTIA. SY0-701 and related marks are trademarks of their respective owners, used for identification only. Exam facts checked against official CompTIA materials (as of November 2026); always confirm current details with the vendor before booking.